QUESTIONS #4


by  Walt  Brown  PhD



Galaxies  Are  Billions  of  Light-Years  Away,  So  Isn't  the  Universe  Billions  of  Years  Old?


The logic behind this common question has several hidden assumptions, two of which are addressed by the following italicized questions:



a. Was space, along with light emitted by stars, rapidly
stretched out soon after creation began? If so, energy
would have been added to the universe and starlight
during that stretching. Pages 328-332 show that the
scientific evidence clearly favors this stretching
explanation over the big bang theory, which also
claims that space expanded rapidly. (Yet, the big
bang theory says all this expansion energy, plus all
the matter in the universe, was, at the beginning of
time, inside a volume much smaller than a pinhead.


b. Has starlight always traveled at its present speed—
about 186,000 miles per second or, more precisely,
299,792.458 kilometers per second?


If either (a) space and its starlight were stretched out, or (b) the speed of light was much faster in the past, then distant stars should be visible in a young universe. Here we will address possibility (b) by examining the historical measurements of the speed of light.


THE  BIG-BANG  IDEA  IS  ONLY  CORRECT  IN  ONE  POINT  -  THERE  WAS  A  TIME  OF  NOTHING;  AND  FROM  NOTHING  CAME  THE  UNIVERSE;  THIS  IS  WHAT  THE  BIBLE  CLEARLY  TEACHES.  THERE  WAS  A  TIME  OF  ONLY  THE  "SPIRIT"  WORLD  -  GOD,  CHRIST,  ANGELS,  AND  SPIRIT  CREATURES.  THIS  I  PROVE  IN  OTHER  STUDIES  ON  THIS  WEBSITE.


THE  SPEED  OF  LIGHT  MAY  WELL  HAVE  BEEN  DIFFERENT  THAN  IT  IS  NOW;  WE  SIMPLY  DO  NOT  KNOW  IF  ITS  SPEED  HAS  ALWAYS  BEEN  CONSTANT  AS  IT  IS  TODAY.  THEN  WE  MUST  TAKE  INTO  ACCOUNT  "MIRACLES"  -  GOD  SPEAKS [WHATEVER  WORDS]  AND  IT  IS  DONE  IN  THE  BLINK  OF  AN  EYE  -  Keith Hunt


Historical Measurements. During the past 300 years, at least 164 separate measurements of the speed of light have been published. Sixteen different measurement techniques were used. Astronomer Barry Setterfield of Australia has studied these measurements, especially their precision and experimental errors.1 His results show that the speed of light has apparently decreased so rapidly that experimental error cannot explain it! In the seven instances where the same scientists remeasured the speed of light with the same equipment years later, a decrease was always reported. The decreases were often several times greater than the reported experimental errors. I have conducted other analyses that weight (or give significance to) each measurement according to its accuracy. Even after considering the wide range of accuracies, it is hard to see how one can claim, with any statistical rigor, that the speed of light has remained constant.2


TODAY  I  THINK  WE  CAN  SAY  IT  IS  PRETTY  CONSTANT;  SO-CALLED  EXPERIMENTS  CAN  HAVE  ALL  KINDS  OF  PROBLEMS  WITH  THEM.  MOST,  THE  VAST  MAJORITY,  OF  SCIENTISTS  STILL  SAY  THAT  TODAY  LIGHT  TRAVELS  AT  186,000  MILES  A  SECOND.  HAS  IT  ALWAYS  TRAVELED  THAT  FAST?  NO  ONE  CAN  KNOW  BUT  GOD;  WE  WERE  NOT  THERE  WHEN  THE  UNIVERSE  WAS  FORMED  AND  GOD  WAS  MAKING  IT,  IN  THE  MANY  WAYS  HE  COULD  HAVE  MADE  IT;  MORE  ON  THAT  LATER  -  Keith Hunt



M. E. J. Gheury de Bray, in 1927, was probably the first to propose a decreasing speed of light.3 He based his conclusion on measurements spanning 75 years. Later, he became more convinced and twice published his results in Nature,4 possibly the most prestigious scientific journal in the world. He emphasized, "If the velocity of light is constant, how is it that, invariably, new determinations give values which are lower than the last one obtained ... There are twenty-two coincidences in favour of a decreas of the velocity of light, while there is not a single one against it."5 [emphasis in original]


I  HAVE  TO  QUESTION  THE  ACCURACY  OF  THIS  STATEMENT  AND  IDEA.  AGAIN  SAYING  WE  DO  NOT  KNOW  HOW  FAST  LIGHT  TRAVELED  WHEN  GOD  WAS  FORMING  THE  UNIVERSE  -  Keith Hunt



Although the measured speed of light has decreased only about 1% during the past three centuries, the decrease is statistically significant, because measurement techniques can detect changes thousands of times smaller. While the older measurements have greater errors, the trend of the data is startling. The farther back one looks in time, the more rapidly the speed of light seems to have been decreasing. Various mathematical curves fit these three centuries of data. When some of those curves are projected back in time, the speed of light becomes so fast that light from distant galaxies conceivably could have reached Earth in several thousand years.


NOTE  THE  WORD  "SEEMS  to  have  been  decreasing"  -  ONE  PERCENT  IN  3  CENTURIES  IS  HARDLY  WORTH  NOTING,  IF  THAT  IS  EVEN  CORRECT,  WHICH  I  WILL  QUESTION.  BUT  YES  IT  STILL  REMAINS  WE  JUST  DO  NOT  KNOW  WHAT  SPEED  LIGHT  TRAVELED  AT  THE  BEGINNING  OF  THE  UNIVERSE  FORMATION  -  Keith Hunt



No scientific law requires the speed of light to be constant.6 Many simply assume that it is constant, and of course, changing old ways of thinking is sometimes difficult. Russian cosinologist, V. S. Troitskii, at the Radiophysical Research Institute in Gorky, is also questioning some old beliefs. He concluded, independently of Setterfield, that the speed of light was 10 billion times faster at time zero!7 Furthermore, he attributed the cosmic microwave background radiation and most redshifts to this rapidly decreasing speed of light. Setterfield reached the same conclusion concerning redshifts by a different method. If either Setterfield or Troitskii is correct, the big bang theory will fall (with a big bang).


Other cosmologists are proposing an enormous decay in the speed of light.8 Several of their theoretical problems with the big bang theory are solved if light once traveled millions of times faster.9


TO  SAY  10  BILLION  TIMES  FASTER  IS  PURELY  A  GUESS!  BUT  YES  GOD  COULD  HAVE  HAD  LIGHT  TRAVELING  MUCH  FASTER  IN  THE  BEGINNINGS  OF  CREATING  THE  UNIVERSE  -  Keith  Hunt


Atomic vs. Orbital Time. Why would the speed of light decrease? T. C. Van Flandern, working at the U.S. Naval Observatory, showed that atomic clocks are probably slowing relative to orbital clocks.10 Orbital clocks are based on orbiting astronomical bodies, especially Earth's one-year period about the Sun. Before 1967, one second of time was defined by international agreement as 1/31,556,925.9747 of the average time it takes Earth to orbit the Sun. On the other hand, atomic clocks are based on the vibrational period of the cesium-133 atom. In 1967, a second was redefined as 9,192,631,770 oscillations of the cesium-133 atom. Van Flandern showed that if atomic clocks are "correct," the orbital speeds of Mercury, Venus, and Mars are increasing. Consequently, the gravitational "constant" should be changing. However, he noted that if orbital clocks are "correct," then the gravitational constant is truly constant, but atomic vibrations and the


Figure 168: Atomic Clock. This atomic clock at the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology is named NIST-7. If its time were compared with a similar clock 6 million years from now, they might differ by only one second! A newer development, called NIST F-1, achieves three times greater precision by cooling the vibrating atoms to nearly absolute zero. Despite the extreme precision of atomic clocks, we have no assurance that they are not all drifting relative to "true" time. In other words, we can marvel at the precision of atomic clocks, but we cannot be certain of their accuracy.


speed of light are decreasing. The drift between the two types of clocks was only several parts per billion per year. But again, the precision of the measurements is so good that the discrepancy is probably real.


TRYING  TO  SPLIT-HAIRS  IS  REALLY  A  NON-PRODUCTIVE  EFFORT.  TIME  OF  THIS  OR  THAT  TO  GOD  MEANS  NOTHING;  HE  CAN  DO  WHATEVER  TIME  HE  WANTS  WITH  WHATEVER  HE  WANTS.  NONE  OF  ALL  THIS  CAN  PROVE  HOW  OLD  THE  UNIVERSE  IS,  UNLESS  YOU  HAVE  SOMETHING  TO  TRY  AND  HOLD  ON  TO  LIKE  THE  TEACHING  OF  ONLY  6  DAYS  OF  GENESIS  TO  CREATE  THE  WHOLE  UNIVERSE  -  Keith Hunt



For the following four reasons, orbital clocks seem to be correct and atomic frequencies are probably slowing very slightly.


If atomic clocks and Van Flandern's study are correct, the gravitational "constant" should be changing. Other studies have not detected variations in the gravitational constant.


If a planet's orbital speed increased (and all other orbital parameters remained the same), the planet's energy would increase. That would violate the law of conservation of mass-energy.


If atomic time is slowing, then clocks based on the radioactive decay of atoms should also be slowing. Radiometric dating techniques would give ages that are too old. This would bring radiometric clocks more in line with most dating clocks. It would also explain why no primordial isotopes have half-lives of less than 50 million years. Such isotopes simply decayed away when radioactive decay rates were much greater.11


If atomic frequencies are decreasing, then five "properties" of the atom, such as Planck's constant, should also be changing. Statistical studies of past

measurements show that four of the five "constants" are changing—and in the right direction.12


So, orbital clocks seem to be more accurate than the extremely precise atomic clocks.13


SO  WHAT?  IT  IS  ALL  A  MIND  GAME  OF  HAIR  SPLITTING;  IT  REALLY  MEANS  NOTHING  TO  PROVE  HOW  OLD  THE  UNIVERSE  IS  -  Keith Hunt



Many of us were skeptical of Setter-fields initial claim, because the decrease in the speed-of-light measurements ceased in 1960. Large, one-time changes seldom occur in nature. The measurement techniques were precise enough to detect any decrease in the speed of light after 1960, if the trend of the prior three centuries had continued. Later, Setterfield realized that beginning in the 1960s, atomic clocks were used to measure the speed of light. If atomic frequencies are decreasing, then both the measured quantity (the speed of light) and the newly adopted measuring tool (atomic clocks) are changing at the same rate. Naturally, no relative change would be detected, and the speed of light would be constant in atomic time—but not orbital time.


AGAIN  ALL  MIND  GAMES;  ADDING  UP  TO  NOTHING  IN  WAY  OF  PROOF  FOR  THE  AGE  OF  THE  UNIVERSE  -  Keith Hunt



Misconceptions. Does the decrease in the speed of light conflict with the statement frequently attributed to Albert Einstein that the speed of light is constant? Not really. Einstein said that the speed of light was not altered by the velocity of the light's source. Setterfield says that the speed of light decreases over time.


SO  SCIENTISTS  DISAGREE…. WHAT  ELSE  IS  NEW?  AS  WISE  KING  SOLOMON  SAID,  "THERE  IS  NOTHING  NEW  UNDER  THE  SUN."  -  Keith Hunt


Einstein's statement that the speed of light is independent of the velocity of the light source, is called Einstein's Second Postulate. (Many have misinterpreted it to mean that "Einstein said the speed of light is constant over time.") Einstein's Second Postulate is surprising, but probably true. Wouldn't we expect a ball thrown from a fast train in the forward direction to travel faster than one thrown in the opposite direction, at least to an observer on the ground? While that is true for a thrown ball, some experimental evidence indicates it is not true for light.14 Light, launched from a fast-moving train, will travel at the same speed in all directions. This strange property of light led to the more extensive theory of special relativity.15


YA,  AND  IF  GOD  AT  TIMES  WANTS  TO  CHANGE  THE  SPEED  OF  LIGHT,   HE  JUST  SAYS  THE  WORD  AND  IT  IS  DONE.  WE  CANNOT  PUT  GOD  IN  A  BOX  TIED  UP  WITH  A  NICE  PINK  RIBBON  -  Keith Hunt



Some people give another explanation for why we see distant stars in a young universe. They believe that God created a beam of light between Earth and each star. Of course, a creation would immediately produce completed things. Instantly, they would look much older than they really were. This is called "creation with the appearance of age." The concept is sound. However, for starlight, this presents two difficulties:


IT  DOES?  YOU  MEAN  GOD  HAS  DIFFICULTIES  HE  CAN  NOT  OVERCOME?  -  Keith Hunt



  Bright, exploding stars are called "supernovas." If starlight, seemingly from a supernova, had been created en route to Earth and did not originate at the surface of an exploding star, then what exploded? Only a relatively short beam would have been created near Earth. If the image of an



Figure 169: Hubble Deep Field North. The Hubble Space Telescope, searching for evolving galaxies in December 1995, focused for 10 continuous days on a tiny patch of sky, so small when viewed from Earth that a grain of sand held at arm's length would cover that area. This picture of that tiny patch of sky is called Hubble Deep Field North. Most objects in it are not isolated stars, but galaxies, each containing billions of stars. Of the 3,000 galaxies photographed that emitted enough light to measure their redshifts, which presumably measure distance, all seemed surprisingly mature. As stated in Scientific American, "the formation of 'ordinary' spiral and elliptical galaxies is apparently still out of reach of most redshift surveys."16 Moreover, fully formed clusters of galaxies, not just galaxies, are seen at the greatest distances visible to the Hubble Space Telescope.17 In 1998 and 2004, similar pictures—with similar results—were taken.


Think about this. There is not enough time in the age of the universe (even as evolutionists imagine it, times a billion) for gravity to pull together all the particles comprising clusters of galaxies.18 (As explained under "Galaxies" on page 34, clusters of galaxies cannot form, even granting all this time.) Because the mos't current studies show fully-formed galaxies even farther away than those shown above,19 creation becomes the logical and obvious alternative. We may be seeing galaxies as they looked months after they were created. Vast amounts of time are no longer needed. [See page 336.]


explosion was created on that short beam of light, then the star never existed and the explosion never happened. One finds this hard to accept.


WITH  GOD  AN  EXPLODING  STAR  HE  CREATED  FULLY  MATURE,  READY  TO  EXPLODE  IN  A  SHORT  PERIOD  OF  TIME,  BILLIONS  OF  MILES  FROM  EARTH,  THEN  SAYING  THE  WORD  "LET  ITS  LIGHT  REACH  EARTH  NOW."  WELL  IT  IS  SPOKEN  AND  IT  IS  DONE.  GOD  CAN  DO  WHATEVER  HE  WANTS  BY  THE  COMMAND  OF  HIS  WORD  -  Keith Hunt



  Every hot gas radiates a unique set of precise colors, called its emission spectrum. The gaseous envelope around each star also emits specific colors that identify the chemical composition of the gas. Because all starlight has emission spectra, this strongly suggests that a star's light originated at the star—not in cold, empty space. Each beam of starlight also carries other information, such as the star's spin rate, magnetic field, surface temperature, and the chemical composition of the cold gases between the star and Earth. Of course, God could have created this beam of light with all this information in it. However, the real question is not "Could God have done it?" but "Did He?"


DID  HE?  WELL  WE  JUST  DO  NOT  KNOW!  BUT  FOR  SURE  GOD  CAN  DO  ANYTHING  HE  WISHES  OR  COMMANDS  DONE.  WHAT  WE  SEE  IN  LIGHT  TODAY  REACHING  US,  IS  WHAT  WE  SEE  AND  CAN  DETECT  WITH  OUR  PHYSICAL  WHATEVERS  WE  HAVE  IN  TODAY'S  SCIENCE  WORLD;  THIS  DOES  NOT  PROVE  IT  WAS  ALWAYS  LIKE  THAT;  IT  ONLY  PROVES  WHAT  IT  IS  TODAY  AS  WE  HAVE  LIVED  AND  MADE  SCIENCE  GADGETS  -  Keith Hunt



Therefore, starlight seems to have originated at stellar surfaces, not in empty space.


IT  WOULD  INDEED  BE  LOGICAL  FOR  THE  HUMAN  MIND  TO  SO  ADUCE;  BUT  THERE  ARE  MANY  MANY  THINGS  TO  CONSIDER  AS  TO  HOW  GOD  CREATED  THE  UNIVERSE  IN  THE  "BEGINNINGS"  AS  THE  ORIGINAL  HEBREW  READS  IN  GEN.1:1  AND  AS  FENTON  TRANSLATED  THE  HEBREW  AS  "BY  PERIODS….God  created  the  heavens  and  the  earth"  IN  HIS  TRANSLATION  OF  THE  BIBLE  -  Keith Hunt



Surprising Observations. Starlight from distant stars and galaxies is redshifted—meaning that their light is redder than one might expect. Although other interpretations are possible, most astronomers have interpreted red-shifted light to be a wave effect, similar to that of the lower pitch of a train's whistle when the train is going away from an observer. As the wave emitter (train or star) moves away from an observer, the waves are stretched, making them lower in pitch (for the train) or redder in color (for the star or galaxy). The greater a star's or galaxy's redshift, the faster it is supposedly moving away from us.


MAYBE  AND  MAYBE  NOT….. DEPENDING  ON  HOW  GOD  WANTS  IT  TO  BE  AND  US  TO  SEE  -  Keith Hunt



Since 1976, William Tifft, a University of Arizona astronomer, has found that the redshifts of distant stars and galaxies typically differ from each other by only a few fixed amounts.20 This is very strange if stars are actually moving away from us. It would be as if galaxies could travel only at specific speeds, jumping abruptly from one speed to another, without passing through intermediate speeds. If stars are not moving away from us at high speeds, the big bang theory is wrong, along with many other related beliefs in the field of cosmology. Other astronomers, not initially believing Tifft's results, did similar work and reached the same conclusion.


THE  BIG  BANG  IS  WRONG….. THE  ONLY  PART  THEY  HAVE  RIGHT  IS  THAT  OUT  OF  NOTHING  CAME  THE  PHYSICAL  UNIVERSE  -  COLORS  AND  SPEED  IS  UP  TO  GOD  TO  DETERMINE,  AND  CHANGE  WHEN  AND  IF  HE  DECIDES  -  Keith Hunt



All atoms give off tiny bundles of energy (called quanta) of fixed amounts—and nothing in between. So, Setterfield believes that the "quantization of redshifts," as many



Figure 170: Spiral Galaxies. The arms in these six representative spiral galaxies have about the same amount of twist. Their distances from Earth are shown in light-years. (One light-year, the distance light travels in one year, equals about 5,879,000,000,000 miles.) For the light from all galaxies to arrive at Earth tonight, the more distant galaxies, which had to release their light long before the closer galaxies, did not have as much time to rotate and twist their arms. Therefore, farther galaxies should have less twist. Of course, if light traveled millions of times faster in the past, the farthest galaxies did not have to send their light long before the nearest galaxies. Spiral galaxies should have similar twists. This turns out to be the case.21 The galaxies are: A) M33, or NGC 598; B) M101, or NGC 5457; C) M51, or NGC 5194; D) NGC 4559; E) M88, or NGC 4501; and F) NGC 772. All distances are taken from R. Brent Tully, Nearby Galaxies Catalog (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988).


describe it, is an atomic effect, not a strange recessional-velocity effect. If space slowly absorbs energy from all emitted light, it would do so in fixed increments, which would redshift starlight, with the farthest star's light red-shifting the most. Setterfield is working on a theory to tie this and the decay in the speed of light together. If he is correct, we should soon see the redshifts of a few distant galaxies suddenly decrease. This may explain why two distinct redshifts are seen in each of several well-studied galaxies;22 they are obviously not flying apart!


MAYBE  NOT  IN  OUR  PHYSICAL  MIND  BASED  UPON  OUR  OBSERVATION  OF  COLOR  OR  WHATEVERS  THAT  WE  CAN  PUT  IN  A  TEST  TUBE;  BUT  GOD  NEEDS  NOT  COLOR  OR  TEST  TUBES  OR  ANYTHING  WE  HUMANS  NEED  TO  TRY  AND  ADD  UP  2  PLUS  2  TO  MAKE  4.  GOD  AIN'T  IN  OUR  WORLD;  HE  DOES  NOT  NEED  TO  PLAY  BY  OUR  RULES;  HIS  ARITHMETIC  AIN'T  OURS,  FOR  HE  SAID  ADAM  AND  EVE  WOULD  BE  ONE.  SO  GOD  CAN  ADD  ONE  PLUS  ONE  AND  MAKE  IT  ONE  IF  HE  DESIRES  -  Keith  Hunt



Another surprising observation is that most distant galaxies look remarkably similar to nearer galaxies. For example, galaxies are fully developed and show no signs of evolving. This puzzles astronomers.23 If the speed of light has decreased drastically, these distant, yet mature, galaxies no longer need explaining. Also, the light from a distant galaxy would have reached Earth not too long after the light from nearby galaxies. This maybe why spiral galaxies, both near and far, have similar twists. 


IT'S  AGAIN  ALL  IN  THE  HANDS  OF  GOD  -  HOW  HE  DECIDED  TO  FORM  THE  GALAXIES,  THE  SUNS,  THE  BLACK  HOLES,  THE  CLOUDS  OF  SPACE  DUST,  AND  ETC.  PLUS  ETC.  GOD  SAID  IT  AND  IT  WAS  DONE,  "GALAXY  BE  OVER  THERE,  FULLY  FORMED  AND  MATURE"  -  AND  IT  WAS  DONE  -  Keith Hunt



A Critical Test. If the speed of light has decreased a millionfold, we should observe events in outer space in extreme slow motion. Here is why.


Imagine a time in the distant past when the speed of light was a million times faster than it is today. On a hypothetical planet, billions of light-years from Earth, a light started flashing toward Earth every second. Each flash then began a very long trip to Earth. Because the speed of light was a million times greater than it is today, those initial flashes were spaced a million times farther apart than they would have been at today's slower speed of light.


ANOTHER  WAY  OF  SAYING  GOD  SAID,  "LET  THE  LIGHT  OF  THIS  GALAXY  REACH  EARTH."  IN  A  HUNDRED  YEARS,  A  THOUSAND  YEARS,  FIVE   THOUSAND  YEARS….WHATEVER  WAS  THE  WILL  OF  GOD  FOR  GALAXIES  BILLIONS  OF  MILES  AWAY  FROM  EARTH  -  Keith Hunt

  


Now, thousands of years later, imagine that throughout the universe, the speed of light has slowed to today's speed. The first of those light flashes—strung out like beads sliding down a long string—are approaching Earth. The large distances separating adjacent flashes have remained constant during those thousands of years, so the moving flashes slowed in unison. Because the first flashes to strike Earth are spaced so far apart, they will strike Earth every million seconds. In other words, we are seeing past events on that planet (the flashing of a light) in slow motion. If the speed of light has been decreasing since the creation, then the farther out in space we look, the more extreme this slow motion becomes.


ALL  IDEAS  AND  THEORIES.  WE  WERE  NOT  THERE  IN  THE  "BEGINNINGS"  OF  THE  UNIVERSE;  NOTHING  TODAY  AS  WE  MAY  THINK  OF  CONSTANT,  NEEDED  TO  BE  CONSTANT  BACK  THEN.  GOD  SPOKE  AND  IT  WAS  DONE,  IN  WAYS  WE  CAN  ONLY  IMAGINE  AND  POSTULATE  ON  -  Keith Hunt



About half the stars in our galaxy are binary. That is, they and a companion star are in a tight orbit around their common center of mass. If there is a "slow-motion effect," the apparent orbital periods of binary stars should tend to increase with increasing distance from Earth. If the speed of light has been decreasing, the Hubble Space Telescope may eventually find that binary stars at great distances have very long orbital periods, showing that we are observing them in slow motion.


……….


AND  IT  ALL  MAY  MEAN  NOTHING,  BUT  MORE  IDEAS  AND  GUESSES,  THEORIES,  AND  SPECULATION.  WE  WERE  NOT  THERE  IN  THE  BEGINNINGS,  WE  HAVE  NO  IDEA  HOW  GOD  SPOKE,  CREATED,  AND  IT  WAS  DONE.


WHAT  WE  DO  HAVE  IS  THE  HEBREW  OF  GENESIS  1:1  THE  WORD  "BEGINNING"  IS  PLURAL  IN  THE  HEBREW  =  "BEGINNINGS"  -  HENCE  FENTON [WHO  STUDIED  HEBREW  FOR  50  YEARS  BEFORE  TRANSLATING  THE  BIBLE  INTO  ENGLISH],  SAYS  IT  IS  PLURAL  IN  THE  HEBREW  AND  SO  HE  PUT  IT "BY  PERIODS  GOD  CREATED  THE  HEAVENS  AND  THE  EARTH."


GOD  DID  NOT  EVOLVE  THE  UNIVERSE  OVER  BILLIONS  OR  TRILLIONS  OF  YEARS,  AS  THE  EVOLUTIONISTS  BIG  BANG  GUYS/GALS  LIKE  TO  TEACH.  THERE  SURELY  WAS  INDEED  NOTHING  PHYSICAL  IN  THE  UNIVERSE,  THEN  THERE  WAS  PHYSICAL  GALAXIES,  STARS  YOUNG  OR  OLD,  STARS  NEAR  READY  TO  EXPLODE,  STARS  LIKE  OUR  SUN  FAR  FAR  AWAY  FROM  EXPLODING;  THERE  WAS  SPACE  GAS  AND  SPACE  CLOUDS;  THERE  WERE  CLUSTERS  OF  GALAXIES  MADE  OVER  THERE,  SOME  WIDER  CLUSTERS  OVER  HERE;  SOME  GALAXY ON  COLLISION  WITH  ANOTHER  GALAXY,  SOME  THOUSANDS  OF MORE  YEARS  AWAY  FROM  COLLIDING.  THIS  PART  OF  THE  UNIVERSE  CREATED  BEFORE  ANOTHER  PART….. BY  PERIODS….. THIS  WAS  DONE  AND  THAT  WAS  DONE.  AT  SOME  POINT  IN  HISTORY  OUR  EARTH  AND  MOON  WAS  CREATED  BY  THE  COMMAND  OF  GOD'S  VOICE,  AFTER  OUR  SUN  WAS  CREATED,  AFTER  OUR  GALAXY  WAS  CREATED.  OUR  SOLAR  SYSTEM  CREATED  WHEN  GOD  SAID  "CREATE  IT,  FOR  I  HAVE  A  PURPOSE  FOR  IT."


MAN [AND WOMAN FROM MAN]  WAS  CREATED  NOT  SLOWLY  BY  EVOLUTION,  NOT  THIS  PART  FOR  THOUSANDS  OF  YEARS,  THEN  ADD  ANOTHER  PART,  AND  SO  ON.  GOD  CREATED  MAN  FULLY  FORMED  AND  AGED  AS  A  MAN,  NOT  A  CHILD.  EVE  FULLY  FORMED  AS  A  WOMAN  NOT  A  CHILD.  YES  AGE  WAS  BUILT  IN  SHALL  BE  SAY  -  MATURITY  BUILT  IN  FROM  THE  VERY  BEGINNING.


SO  THE  UNIVERSE;  BE  IT  BILLIONS  OR  MILLIONS  OR  HUNDREDS  OF  THOUSANDS,  OR  TENS  OF  THOUSANDS  OF  YEARS  AGO.  


IT  WAS  FINALLY  DONE  AND  WAS  MOVED  INTO  WHATEVER  WE  SEE  TODAY.  HOWEVER  IT  IS  MOVING  TODAY  AS  GOD  WILLS  IT.


BEFORE  THE  END  OF  THIS  AGE  GOD  WILL  YET  SHAKE  THE  HEAVENS  AND  THIS  EARTH,  IT  WILL  MOVE  AGAIN  AS  HE  WILLS,  HOW  HE  WILLS,  AND  WHEN  HE  WILLS;  SO  SAYS  THE  WORD  OF  THE  LORD.


Keith Hunt