In Search of... The Origin of Nations


The specific roles of the tribes of Israel

From the descriptions of the tribes, the way the acted in the Bible and from their modern histories, it would appear that they have definitive, organised roles. See Gen 29; 30; 49; Num 23; 24; Deut 33; Jud5.

Judah -

Gen 49:8  Judah, may your brothers praise you. May your hand be in the neck of your enemies. May your father's sons bow before you.

Gen 49:9 Judah is a lion's whelp. My son, you have gone up from the prey. He stooped, he crouched like a lion; and like a lioness, who shall rouse him? [a warrior people]

Gen 49:10 The scepter (the royal line] shall not depart from Judah, nor a Lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come. And the obedience of the peoples to him.

Jdg 20:18 And the sons of Israel rose and went up to the house of God and asked counsel of God, and said, Which of us shall go up first to the battle against the sons of Benjamin? And Jehovah said, Judah first, [see Deut 33:7]

I Ch 5:2 For Judah prevailed among his brothers, and from him came the chief ruler [the royal line of David which includes the Messiah], but the birthright was Joseph's;

2 Ch 9:8 Blessed be Jehovah your God, who delighted in you to set you on His throne to be king for Jehovah your God. Because your God loved Israel to establish them forever, therefore He made you king over them to do judgment and justice.

ICh 29:23 And Solomon sat on the throne of Jehovah as king in place of David his father. And he was blessed, and all Israel obeyed him. [the throne of Judah, through David, is the Lord's Throne! WOE to those that despise it]

Psa 78:67 And He refused the tabernacle of Joseph, and chose not the tribe of Ephraim;

Psa 78:68 but chose the tribe of Judah, the mount Zion which He loved, [see I Kings 

11:36; Zech 8:15]


Zee 14:14 And Judah also shall fight at Jerusalem; and the wealth of all the nations all around shall be gathered, gold, and silver, and clothing in great abundance [those nations who stole Israel's wealth in the Tribulation, will have that wealth confiscated]


Psa 60:7   Gilead is Mine, and Manasseh is Mine; and Ephraim is the strength of My head, Judah is Mylawgiver;

Psa 108:8 Gilead is Mine; Manasseh is Mine and Ephraim is the strength of My head; Judah is My lawgiver [seeNum 21:18; Is 33:22; James 4:12]

Psa 114:2 Judah was His sanctuary, and Israel was His kingdom, [see Is 65:9]

Jer 33:14 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will perform that good thing which I have promised unto the house of Israel and to the house of Judah.

Jer 33:17 For thus saith the LORD; David shall never want a man [of Judah] to sit upon the throne of the house of Israel.2330

Judah produced the royal line, a warrior class and lawmakers. In other words they were to be the political leaders. It is interesting that the Scots have produced inventions, military leaders and political leaders well above their numbers in the USA, Australia and South Africa. In ancient Israel, Judah led the other tribes in the camp. In the USA the Scots were in the forefront of the colonising people, leading the way in the conquest of the West (a separate paper will issue on the Judahic heritage of the British Royalty, Ulster, Lowlander and especially Highland Scots). They are a very brave people who are willing to take on anything and anyone:

Pro 28:1 The wicked flee when no man pursues; but the righteous are bold as a lion.

Throughout Bible times they dwelt within and in proximity to Jerusalem, the capital city of Jerusalem as the leading tribe. And as fierce defenders of God's way, the Levites, Temple and all that goes with leadership.


Eze 44:10 But the Levites who have gone far away from Me, when Israel went astray; those who went astray from Me after their idols; they shall even bear their iniquity.

Eze 44:11    Yet they shall be ministers in My sanctuary, overseers at the gates of the house and

ministering to the house. They shall kill the burnt offering and the sacrifice for the people, and they shall stand before them to minister to them.


2330 Hos 11:12 Ephraim circles around Me with lying, and the house of Israel with deceit. But Judah still rules with God, and is faithful with the saints.

Zee 9:13 For I have bent Judah for me as a bow; I filled it with Ephraim, and I will stir up your sons, O Zion, against your sons, O Greece, and make you as the sword of a mighty man. [see 10:3-7]

Zee 12:5 And the governors of Judah shall say in their heart, The people of Jerusalem shall be my strength in Jehovah of Hosts their God.

Zee 12:6 In that day I will make the governors of Judah like a hearth of fire among the wood, and like a torch of fire among cut grain. And they shall devour all the peoples all around, on the right hand and on the left hand. And Jerusalem shall be inhabited again in her place, in Jerusalem.

Zee 12:7 Jehovah also shall save the tents of Judah first, so that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the people of Jerusalem may not be magnified above Judah.

Zee 12:8 In that day Jehovah shall defend around the people of Jerusalem. And it will be, he who is feeble among them at that day shall be like David; and the house of David shall be like God, like the Angel of Jehovah before them.

Joe 3:18 And it shall be, in that day the mountains shall drop down new wine, and the hills shall flow with milk, and all the rivers of Judah shall flow with waters; and a fountain shall come forth from the house of Jehovah, and shall water the valley of Shittim.

Joe 3:19 Egypt shall be a ruin, and Edom shall be a desolate wilderness, from violence done to the sons of Judah, whose innocent blood they poured out in their land.

Joe 3:20 But Judah will dwell forever, and Jerusalem to generation and generation, [just as the Scots were the pioneers leading the way so often in the colonies, in bringing tribes and peoples to heel under Israel, so they shall fulfil this function again].


Eze 44:12  Because they ministered to them before their idols, and caused the house of Israel to fall into iniquity, therefore I have lifted up My hand against them, says the Lord Jehovah, and they shall bear their iniquity.

Eze 44:13 And they shall not come near Me, to do the office of a priest to Me, nor to come near any of My holy things, in the most holy place; but they shall bear their shame and their abominations which they have committed.

Eze 44:14 But I will make them keepers of the charge of the house for all its service, and for all that shall be done in it.

Jer 33:14 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will perform that good thing which I have promised unto the house of Israel and to the house of Judah.

Jer 33:18 Neither shall the priests the Levites want a man before me to offer burnt offerings, and to kindle meat offerings, and to do sacrifice continually [this seems to imply that ministers would emanate from Levi for all generations and many of them are found in the Church].

Here it is self-evident that Levi shall be the priests (ministers or pastors) in the Millennium - setting up God's priesthood under the saints, across the globe in all nations. They will provide religious services to all nations and peoples, assisting them to be grafted spiritually into Israel - for there is no salvation without all peoples being grafted into His covenant people. As such, the true identity and purpose of Israel is one of the central components of the message of salvation and the Gospel.

Ephraim -

Jer 31:6 For there shall be a day that the watchmen on Mount Ephraim shall cry, Arise and let us go up to Zion to Jehovah our God!

Jer 31:7 For so says Jehovah, Sing with gladness for Jacob, and shout among the chief of the nations. Cry out, give praise and say, O Jehovah, save Your people, the remnant of Israel.

Jer 31:20 Is Ephraim My dear son? Is he a delightful child? For as often as I spoke against him, I earnestly remember him still. Therefore My heart is troubled for him; I will surely have mercy on him, says Jehovah.

Hos 11:8 How shall I give you up, Ephraim? How shall I deliver you, Israel? How shall I make you like Admah? How shall I set you as Zeboim? My heart is turned within Me; My compassions are kindled together. 

Hos 11:9 I will not carry out the heat of My anger; I will not return to destroy Ephraim. For I am God and not man, the Holy One in your midst; and I will not enter into the city. [God has special feelings toward Ephraim]

Zee 10:6 And I will strengthen the house of Judah, and I will save the house of Joseph, and I will return to save them; for I have pity on them. And they shall be as though I had not cast them off; for I am Jehovah their God, and I will answer them.

Zee 10:7 And Ephraim shall be like a mighty one, and their heart shall rejoice as by wine. And their sons shall see and be glad; their heart shall rejoice in Jehovah. [Judah and Ephraim mentioned together once again, working together]

As we have seen in so many scriptures, Ephraim and Judah are often mentioned together. Therefore, like the Scots and English, they must be in unison to some degree to assist in bringing about God's Kingdom on earth.

These people are very innovative and suitable for colonising due to their attributes. They shall continue to supply the majority of inhabitants to the colonies.

Manasseh -

The Bible doesn't specify, but given the attributes of Anglo-Americans, they think big, mass produce goods and services which has resulted in leadership of the world's economy. It would seem that they would have a similar role in the Millennium.

Some have speculated that the inventive genius of these peoples will be guided by God to provide technological breakthroughs for the benefit of man in various fields, just as they have today, in many ways. Similarly, the other tribes' contributions will be based on national talents and blessings.

The British Empire and the Kingdom of God on earth

In the Bible we often find an image or pattern of things to come. For example Joshua and Israel's takeover of the land of Canaan (Palestine or Holy Land) is typological of the coming takeover of the Holy Land by Israel under the Messiah.

Even though the above image or parallel is rough, it does give us some insights into the future world.

After the final defeat of Napoleon, Metternich's Congress of Europe claimed to have revived 'A World Restored' which was also the time of Britain's rise to greatness, similar in a sense to the 'Restoration of all things':

Act 3:20 And He shall send Jesus Christ, who before was proclaimed to you,

Act 3:21   whom Heaven truly needs to receive until the times of restoration of all things, which God has spoken by the mouth of His holy prophets since the world began.

At its height, the British Empire was 91 times the size of its motherland, Britain, occupying all continents and comprising all races and colours. In fact, it had 25% of the world's population under its wing. It was the most extensive empire in world history.

Is it any wonder that many in the 19th century (and many even decades later) thought that the British Empire was the Kingdom of God on earth, smashing the enemy forces portrayed in Daniel 2:31-45? So extensive was the belief that Britain had a mission to educate, civilise and to Christianise the world that in schools at that time you could find pictures of a Jesus Christ holding a Boy Scout by the hand and pointing out the extent of the British Empire on the map.

The recent status of Britain and America at the helm of world affairs is only a foretaste of a greater status in service to the Government of God in the Millennium - in other words it is a type or pattern of what is yet to come like Joshua leading Israel into the Promised Land. In July 1933, Earl Baldwin stated:

"The Empire can only be permanently maintained by a clear conviction of its ultimate goal, the spiritual unity of the whole Empire. That ultimate goal is the Kingdom of Heaven on earth”2331

This demonstrates the depth of feeling and great love for the Empire and its role to serve and uplift the world by the ruling classes. It was an Empire with a glorious mission - yet it has unfinished business which will be accomplished in the future.


2331.  Quoted in Stewart 1942: 15


Following on from this typology, there are some indications that there were some parallels between the British Empire as a forerunner of the Kingdom of God:

1. Extension of law and modern civilisation:

* for example in India wives of deceased husbands were placed on the funeral pile to be

burned alive - the British abolished this and many other evils

* thuggery & those killing travellers were pursued and these practices crushed and outlawed

* slavery outlawed (cp Is 61:1-2)

* a rod was used to beat criminals in India and Kenya, which was, after all, a lot more lenient

than local custom. See Rev 2:27; 19:15 where Christ is said to use a rod on the non-

Israelitish peoples which contrasts with the German cruelty when they dominated Tanzania

etc (cp the rod of Is 10:5)

* Canadian Mounties ensured that law was delivered to remote, wild regions of Canada.

2. Prosperity because of peace:

* The 19th century is known as Pax Britannica - the British Peace. Similarly Christ is called

the Prince of Peace (Is 9:6) because His reign will bring world peace

* During this time they developed technology and industry well ahead of the rest of the world

such as industrial iron production

* Crystal Palace was built to showcase the various machinery and wares of Britain - people

came from around the world to admire British genius (similarly nations will flow to

Jerusalem - Is 2:2-4)

* Just as Britain became prosperous, so in the millennium Israel will enjoy overwhelming

prosperity (Amos 9:13)

* British built dams (eg Aswan), road, immense railways, postal services, communications

* Kipling wrote about the British taking the blessings to other peoples and to uplift them -

with a civilising mission.

* British brought advances in medical science to help the diseased etc (typological of the

divine healings prophesied in Is 35:5-6)

3. Extension of Biblical teachings:

* the translation of the Bible in dozens of languages typological of Is 11:9 *distribution of Bibles

* conservative family values, morals and ethics taught ('Biblical principles') *Queen Victoria gave Bibles to visiting representatives of tribes and peoples. 

* She said 'the Bible is the secret to British greatness'2332

World War One saw the peak of imperial unity, followed by decline. For example, shortly after the First World War, the British had begun building a major naval base on the northern coast of Singapore Island. The construction of the base and Singapore's famous coastal guns took over 15 years to complete. But a fleet was never provided for the base. During the 1920s, spending on the Royal Navy had been slashed. Faith in naval disarmament treaties and the League of Nations, financial constraints, pacifism, and the fact that Britain's local naval defence was reasonably secure,


2332. Points 1,2,3 are generally attributed to a presentation by Dr Rick Sherrod given in 1998. One book which advocates similar views is Grand Union. The Coming World Order: its Religion, Economics and Government by Basil Stewart (Commonwealth and Destiny Publishers, 1942).


caused the Royal Navy to enter the Second World War with less than half the capital warships it had possessed in 1914 (BBC History Magazine website).

Joshua, Solomon and the British Empire were imperfect forerunners or images, in part, of the coming glorious Millennial reign of Christ. They were, after all, human efforts, although brought about by God. The humanness included abuses and sins, but the good outweighed the negatives in the British Empire.

If other nations or religions had what the British Empire possessed the world would have been a savage place indeed with a 'dark ages' of some sort extending over the planet.

God does not micro-manage individuals, churches or nations. He macro-manages - that is He generally guides the people He is working with, but does not force them to observe every detail of His will or character. They must make decisions and develop character themselves and that is why the British Empire made mistakes - humans sin and tend to abuse others, regardless whether God generally guided the Empire.

From the scriptures we may deduce the following:

* The British Empire was typological of the coming reign of Israel over the world

* Israel will attack certain nations

* Israel will take various nations into servitude

* she will be ruling the nations during the Millennium

* Huge physical blessings will flow to Israel

What then, can we make of the above? What will Israel be doing in the millennium?

In effect, there will be an Israelite union bringing about the fulfilment the dreams of certain men in Britain and the USA in the early decades of the twentieth century. Later some led a movement called 'Union Now' - an Anglo-Saxon-Keltic hegemony to rule the world - the British Empire and America were to join forces to do so. The Rhodes scholars were to be trained to be rulers for this honour. Churchill and other British leaders had similar hopes for British ruling classes to be set up all over the world. Although the time for this was premature, certainly the British Empire was typological of the Millennial rule of Israel - presaging what the scriptures obviously demonstrate shall be.

At the young age of 23, Cecil Rhodes had an incredible vision which were outlined in his paper Confession of Faith:

"... the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race. I contend that every acre added to our territory means the birth of more of the English race who otherwise would not be brought into existence.

Added to this, the absorption of the greater portion of the world under our rule simply means the end of all wars. The objects one should work for are first the furtherance of the British Empire, the bringing of the whole uncivilized world under British rule, the recovery of the United States, the making of the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire." [there are other versions of this, but incredibly embellished in usual conspiracy style]

Alas, liberals gradually took over the Rhodes Round Table organisation (as they have other organisations) and it never fulfilled its purpose. In fact, it has been used for vastly different purposes than that which its founders intended. To this day there are groups which are still attempting to bring about a British-American union such as Private Action for British-US Union2333 but with no success.2334



2334In his "Confession of Faith", Cecil Rhodes defined the nature of the group he envisioned would circumvent the current political system to carry out his dream, as described by Milner:

"Men of ability and enthusiasm who find no suitable way to serve their country under the current political system; able youth recruited from the schools and universities; men of wealth with no aim in life; younger sons with high thoughts and great aspirations but without opportunity; rich men whose careers are blighted by some great disappointment. All must be men of ability and character... Rhodes envisages a group of the ablest and the best, bound together by common unselfish ideals of service to what seems to him the greatest cause in the world. There is no mention of material rewards. This is to be a kind of religious brotherhood like the Jesuits [although he was certainly opposed to them, it was their model that he found interesting], 'a church for the extension of the British Empire.'" (Quigley 1981: 34. Quigley is now deceased, but was a professor in the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. He was also Bill Clinton's mentor. It is obvious that his globalist views were in major conflict with those of Rhodes and Milner)

Cecil Rhodes was not only a British imperialist, but joined a Freemasonry lodge.

"A wealthy young man, Cecil Rhodes, like John Ruskin believed that only the British elite could and should rule the world to the benefit and happiness of mankind ...

"Rhodes was, a critic of English Freemasonry - of its impotence and incompetence in advancing British race interest. After being raised to Master Mason on April 17, 1877, Rhodes drafted a program for world dominion by the British race patriots. To guarantee the funding from his vast wealth of his world vision for the British empire, Rhodes wrote in 1877 the first of seven wills that he composed over his lifetime. The first will called for the formation of a "secret society" whose primary function would be focused on returning England to her former glory." [emphasis mine] [apparently this statement was originally posted by THE ROUND TABLE on September 07,1998 at 01:01:11]

There are many competing Masonic groups, most of them being merely a White man's neo-protestant club with silly rituals going back into ancient times. Some lodges however, are obviously evil. These various lodges compete and fight amongst themselves.

In Cross's “The Fall of the British Empire,", a book opposed to the Empire we find the following:

"... How far there was a racialist concept in the British Empire of 1918 is difficult to define. In most British people of the time there lay a deep-rooted belief that they were the best nationality in the world. It was held that particular mixture of English with Scots, Welsh and Irish had produced a 'race' peculiarly suitable for administering the affairs of others, less fortunate, peoples. It might be described as a 'master race' concept, modified to a greater or lesser extent by a desire to be of service." (Cross 1970: 31)

"British racialism was not, strictly, a color racialism. The British believed they were superior to other Europeans as well as to Asians and Africans. Kipling, possibly, expressed the attitude when he wrote of 'the Gentiles' and of 'lesser breeds without the law'. By 'Gentiles', presumably, he meant Europeans outside the British chosen race. The 'lesser breeds' were the races actually subject to the British. There actually flourished a religious sect, the British Israelites, which believed that the British were the lost tribes of Israel and so called by God for high authority. (Cross 1970: 32) [emphasis mine. See also Neal's Imperial British-Israelism: Justification for an Empire and Guibbory's propsoed Imagined Identities: The Use of Judaism in Seventeenth-century England. Also Richard Simpson's dissertation 77ie Political Influence of the British-Israel Movement in the Nineteenth Century and Longley's Chosen People.]

Another advocate of British-American union was Lionel Curtis, the British Empire's leading ideologist around the time of World War One. In his book, The Commonwealth of Nations he wrote:

"The idea of the Empire as a beneficient power, spreading the blessings of civilisation to races which could not govern themselves, was carried to a wide circle of readers by the writings and poems of Rudyard Kipling ...

"I feel that when once the Protestant churches had learned to regard the creation of a world commonwealth as an all-important aspect of their work in realising the Kingdom of God, an international commonwealth in the English-speaking world would come into being in a few generations".2335


"Whether the Empire was supposed to exist just for the enrichment and glorification of the British or whether it represented mainly a trusteeship on behalf of less fortunate peoples was none too clear. The Prince of Wales, calling on his father, King George V, to open the 1924 British Empire Exhibition at Wembley, said:' I hope, sir, that the result of this exhibition will be to impress vividly upon all the peoples of your Empire the advice that you have given them on more than one occasion, that they should be fully awake to their responsibilities as heirs to so glorious a heritage; then they should in no wise be slothful stewards, but that they should work unitedly and energetically to develop the resources of the Empire for the benefit of the British race, for the benefit of those of other races would have accepted our guardianship over their destinies, and for the benefit of mankind generally. 'The Prince's order of priorities- first the 'British race', second the subject races and third mankind generally- aroused no particular comment. Indeed it was a platitude." (Cross 1970: 29)

"The unifying force between ... classes was a group of about 150 boys' boarding schools, known now as 'public schools'. They were the places where 'gentlemen' were trained ... They had developed a common form of organization, curriculum and attitude to life ... In 1918 only one-third of the Conservative Members of Parliament had received a public-school education; by 1935 the proportion had reached two-thirds ... The public-schools took boys at the age of 13 and kept them until 18, consciously attempting to mould them to a standard model. The headmasters were mostly clerics of the Church of England, although by 1918 laymen were getting more and more of the posts, and the boys learned in the school chapel a creed commonly described as 'muscular Christianity ... Virtue, headmasters taught, was not to be acquired by passive contemplation of the mysteries of eternity but by vigorous action in the physical world." (Cross 1970: 35)

Lloyd George himself was influenced heavily by the Cecil Rhodes and Milner RoundTable.

"The Cecil Bloc became an increasingly powerful political force ... grew increasingly anti-German, supported the World War in 1914 and were close to the Milner Group politically, intellectually and socially." (Quigley 1981: 30)

"'The Toynbee group' was a group of political intellectuals ... dominated by Arnold Toynbee and Milner himself... The Cecil Bloc was a nexus of political and social power formed by Lord Salisbury and extending from the great sphere of politics into the fields of education and publicity ... The 'Rhodes secret society' was a group of imperial federalists, formed in the period after 1889 and using the economic resources of South Africa to extend and perpetuate the British Empire. It is doubtful if Milner could have formed his group without assistance from all three of these sources ...

"One of the enduring creations of the Cecil Bloc is the Society for Psychical Research, which holds a position in the history of the Cecil Bloc similar to that held by the Royal Institute of International Affairs in the Milner Group. The Society was founded in 1882 by the Balfour family and their in-laws, Lord Rayleigh and Professor Sidgwick. In the twentieth century it was dominated by those members of the Cecil Bloc who became most readily members of the Milner Group." (Quigley 1981: 31-32)


2335. Curtis 1916: 623, 953


Alas, his views were overtaken by liberals and internationalists who later destroyed the Empire from within and without. In opposition to his views, other organisations have sprung up advocating world governance and the mixing of religions and races as well as the renouncing of Biblical ethics and morals. One member of the United States House of Representatives, Hon. J Thorkelson of Montana, viciously attacked the concept of English-speaking union and in a bizarre series of speeches to the House, attempted to combine the concept of English-speaking union with that of its opposite, world government. It is due to the efforts of people like him and Franklin Roosevelt that this dream never eventuated. You can read Thorkelson's nonsense in the Congressional Record?™

One of those who advocated British global hegemony and who could see God's Plan for Britain was Churchill:

"... he must indeed have a blind soul who cannot see that some great purpose and design is being worked out here below of which we have the honor to be the faithful servants" [through the British Empire - Sir Winston Churchill to the US Congress, 1941].

On June 18,1940, Churchill said to England,

"What General Weygand called the Battle of France is over. The Battle of Britain is about to begin. Upon this battle depends the survival of civilization. Upon it depends our own British life and our empire. The whole fury and might of the enemy will soon be turned upon us. Hitler knows he will have to break us in this island or lose the war. Let us therefore give ourselves to our duty and so bear ourselves that if the British commonwealth and empire last one thousand years, men will say: 'This was their finest hour.'"

This indicates that he probably wished for a 1,000 year British Empire (as Hitler wished for a 1,000 year Reich) - something inside of him and other great British leaders recognise the role Britain must play in the world and will do so again under the Messiah. This was opposite to the nightmare that the German Reich that Hitler wanted would have wrought on the world.

Standing before the students of Glasgow University, Lord Rosebery, who had been a Foreign Secretary and Prime Minister for Britain, pronounce the following concerning the British Empire:

"How marvellous it all is! Built not by saints and angels, but by the work of men's hands; cemented with men's honest blood and with a world of tears, welded by the best brains of centuries past; not without the taint and reproach incidental to all human work, but constructed on the whole with pure and splendid purpose. Human, and yet not wholly human, for the most heedless and the most cynical must see the finger of the Divine.

"Growing as trees grow, while others slept; fed by the faults of others as well as the character of our fathers; reaching with a ripple of a restless tide over tracts, and islands and continents, until our little Britain woke up to find herself the foster-mother of nations and the source of united empires. Do we not hail in this less the energy and fortune of a race than the supreme direction of the Almighty?" [spoken November 1900, emphasis mine]


2336. Congressional Record oi'the 76th Congress, 19, 20,21 August; 3, 5 September 1940.


In contrast we know that Kaiser Wilhelm H's stated the following to his troops:

'Remember that the German people are the chosen of God. On me, as German Emperor, the Spirit of God has descended. I am His weapon, His sword and His Viceregent. Woe to the disobedient.' 

Inside central Europe is a belief that they are the new Israel, the new Zion. Perhaps there is a deeply engrained belief in national psychs that seeks the birthright and covenant, when it is not the will of God.

Another who knew that God had a plan was Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin:

"The history of mankind is not a purposeless history. It is a manifestation of the divine purpose".

In 1907, Britain's Viceroy of India, Lord Curzon, speaking in Birmingham, said:

"I would describe the empire ... as the result, not of an accident or a series of accidents, but of an instinct - that ineradicable and divinely implanted impulse, which has sent the Englishman forth into the uttermost parts of the earth, and made him there the parent of new societies and the architect of unpremeditated creations." 

Even if the above men, and others, were not aware that Britain was a part of Israel, they certainly were imbued by a sense of purpose and mission.

Various people from the British ruling classes would have liked Britain to rule the world together with the USA, but were prevented by the devious President Franklin Roosevelt and others in the American establishment, who worked tirelessly to break up the Empire.

Field Marshall Viscount Montgomery was amongst those that devised an imperial "master plan" to impose British rule on Africa after WWII to help uplift the Africans to "maintain her standard of living and to survive". He was Chief of the Imperial Defence Staff in 1948 - during that time he advocated a "grand design" based on a tour of Africa. He urged British leaders to dominate Africa as a way of maintaining Britain's status in the world:

"In the development of Africa we must adventure courageously, as did Cecil Rhodes".

In the millennium, there will be a type of British Empire (Judah, Levi and Ephraim) in close cooperation with Manasseh, to rule the world. Britain will once again establish colonies in Canada, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, comprising chiefly of Ephraim while Manasseh with vast numbers of Judah will return to America. In fact, in every nation, the British will establish administrative ruling classes: Scottish Judah will be the rulers; Levi will comprise the ministry - Priests and Levites.

Contrawise to Churchill, Hitler is said to have believed in a thousand year Reich. William Shirer in his famous The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich noted that:

"The Third Reich which was born on January 30, 1933, Hitler boasted, would endure for a thousand years, and in Nazi parlance it was often referred to as the "Thousand-Year Reich”2337 [This information was based, in part, on the Proclamation of Sept 5, 1934, at Nuremberg].

"It is clear that the German fate will be decided for the next one hundred years". [Adolf Hitler, December 24, 1940 to his SS personal bodyguard]

Changing his perspective from one hundred to one thousand, Hitler says one month later:

"National Socialism will decide the next one thousand years of German history.”2338

And at Nuremburg, 5 September 1934:

"The German form of life is definitely determined for the next thousand years. For us, the nervous nineteenth century has finally ended. There will be no revolution in Germany for the next one thousand years!"

Similar to Hitler's parallel views on a 1,000 year rule for his race, we find Cecil Rhodes 'awakening' - a virtual epiphany. Rhodes used to describe his 'awakening' to Britain's destiny to visitors and friends and its part is world servant leadership. How different to the globalists, Nazis and communists - such an enormous difference in attitude.

Hermann Rauschning is famous for the book Hitler Speaks, published in 1939. He wrote that in the 1930s

"My informant described to me in full detail a remarkable scene - I should not have credited the story if it had not come from such a source. Hitler stood swaying in his room, looking wildly about him. 'He! He! He's been here!' He gasped. His lips were blue. Sweat streamed down his face. Suddenly he began to reel off figures, and odd words and broken phrases, entirely devoid of sense. It sounded horrible. He used strangely composed and entirely un-German word formations. Then he stood quite still, only his lips moving .... gradually he grew calm. After that he lay asleep for many hours."

Soon after this bizarre event, Hitler shrieked:

"The new man is among us! He is here! I will tell you a secret. I have seen the vision of the new man [German Aryan master race] - fearless and formidable."

Later Hitler said:

"I will tell you a secret. I am founding an Order [of pagans that would rule the world]."

How different to Rhodes' and the Empire's philosophy to serve, uplift, civilize and Christianise the world. Rhodes also formed an order - the Round Table to educate men to run the Empire. In his Confessions of Faith he laid down his notions for the Empire and British world leadership, together with North America. He used to fondly contemplate the place of Great Britain in the world and the uniting of the entire Anglo-Saxon world into a single empire to rule the world - he meditated deeply of the Empire's destiny and sought inspiration in the backdrop of Table Mountain, Cape Town - a mountain he described as the most beautiful in the world. Ten years after Rhodes died, the inauguration of the Rhodes Memorial took place. Rudyard Kipling, a close personal friend of Rhodes


2337. Shirerl991:5

2338. Adolf Hitler, January, 1941. Sources: Bundesarchiv, recorded discs.


wrote that he had gone to the memorial by moonlight and that it was "a thing to rejoice and sing over."

Rhodes died a premature death, having become one of the wealthiest men in the world. His death on 26 March 1902, near Cape Town, was met with deep sorrow by all, including his non-White servants. The opening words of the funeral's eulogy presented by the Archbishop of Cape Town were:

"Do you not know that a warrior, a great man, has fallen this day in Israel?" [this was the Biblical lament of King David at the slaying of Abner, the commander of Saul's army]

How opposite, how different to Hitler's pagan 'vision'. One was inspired by God; the other by Satan. One was for the rightful servant leaders of the world - Israel. The other was the deep-ingrained world view of Assur.

Yet Assur's descendants were not to rule for a millennium; another race is destined to do so - a race that has been granted the birthright and role of leadership with the Messiah during his 1,000 year reign upon the earth (Rev 20). The line of Arphaxad through Israel are destined to rule, following in the footsteps of their forefather. Just as Arphaxad's descendants (proto-Israelites for want of a better term) ruled in various quarters of the earth, followed centuries later by the Israelites in the time of Solomon and later still the British Empire, so these, the birthright covenant people, are destined to rule the world under Christ and the Church.

Clearly, the doctrine of the covenant/birthright people, is not a little thing or something to be played down and ignored. It is a vital part of God's plan of salvation and portrays His wisdom of how He will lead the world and bring many to salvation. Israel is such an important doctrine that she is mentioned hundreds and hundreds of times throughout scripture. Indeed, it is one of the most oft mentioned subjects in the Bible and therefore is very important to God. And if it is important to Him, it had better be important for us too, whether Israelite or non-Israelite.

Let this be a clear warning to those opposed to this vital Biblical truth and who should be teaching it. Teach it or be cursed!

Finally, to reiterate, God covenants with whom He so wishes - in this age it is with Israel. But being a Creator of diversity, He also created different races so that we can learn the lessons of maintaining boundaries, respect for differences, not to feel superior or inferior, and not to lust after the blessings of other nations and races. For all have been blessed, but it is God Who has set up nations for certain responsibilities based on natural gifts He has bestowed. He gives gifts to individuals, families, nations and races and it is therefore He who decides on their roles.

Therefore, it would behove Israelites not to be arrogant and rude toward others, but to demonstrate humility and a servant-leader attitude. Similarly, non-Israelites must not feel inferior and become envious, but must also exhibit the qualities associated with humility.





Keith Hunt