Keith Hunt - United Flight 93 - Page Five   Restitution of All Things

  Home Previous Page Next Page

United Flight 93

A Conspiracy?

                         9/11 AND UNITED FLIGHT 93



It's time now to look at a plane flight on September 11th called
"United 93."

I've watched on Youtube this segment called "Debate: Loose Change
vs Popular Mechanics." We have two guys FOR a "conspiracy" and
two guys AGAINST a "conspiracy."

The two guys FOR a conspiracy say there was just about no plane
parts or bodies in that crash in a farmer's field. The guys
AGAINST say, well we do have the coroner's report and the black
box was found.
The guys FOR a conspiracy say that cell phones do not work above
30,000 feet. The guys AGAINST say yes, we have (whatever the
company was) telling us they did work above 30,000 feet in 2001,
but not very well, so that is why the recordings of cell phone
calls are intermittent.

The clear inference by the fellows FOR a conspiracy is that there
was no such plane or flight. That is clearly what they were
trying to say.

So let's go with the idea that this United flight 93 was a
conspiracy, that there was no such flight. First of all, why bother
making up the idea of such a flight if it was not a real flight
United 93 on that day. If you want to conspire something, why go
to the trouble of inventing such a United Flight 93, why invent
something that could give you problems you do not need, if you
are conspiring to bring something about so you can go to war with
Iraq and Islam leaders. And such an invention of flight 93 would
indeed give you massive problems.

First, you would have to "pay off" or bribe the United Airlines,
the "top guys" to indeed invent such a flight on that 9/11 day.
Then you would need to "pay off" or bribe the ticket collectors,
and the smiling airline crew that greet you as you board. You
would have to "pay off" or bribe a piolet and co-piolet; then
likewise with the ground crew who put your luggage on the plane,
fuel the plane etc., especially the ground crew, for those on
board will die, so no fear of them being interviewed by the
press, but the ground crew, they still remain alive. Now if that
was not all enough trouble, you would have to invent a passenger
list of people who will supposedly die, on a plane flight that
does not exist. That's not all; you would have to have people who
are willing to lie, and weep, and give all kinds of fine stories
to many reporters, about how wonderful this person was who just
died on United Flight 93, that does not exist, but is made up,
for it is a conspiracy. You have to come up with wives, husbands,
mothers, fathers, uncles, aunts, grandparents, and friends, and
co-workers, who knew these wonderful people, will tell stories
about them on TV news and to various reporters; tell about people
that are fictions, because there was no United Flight 93, as it
was a made up conspiracy by the USA Government, to have an excuse
to wage war on Iraq and Islam leaders.
Can you see what an incredible amount of TROUBLE you would have
to go to, to invent a plane, people on board, and relatives and
friends, who would back it all up; lie through their teeth, be
some of the best actors, with crying and emotions, that could
rival any Hollywood star - I mean "award winning" performances.
All the people you would have to "pay off" or bribe to "come on
board" your plans to invent a United Flight 93 for September 11th
2001.

If the flight was not really going to exist, WHY OH WHY would you
go out of your way to invent it all, with all the people that
would have to be involved with such an invention, and be willing
to remain SILENT about it for the rest of their lives. Why would
you want to take a chance, with such a conspiracy as that, if you
did not need to? Why add trouble for yourself in a conspiracy by
inventing all that you would have to invent and all the people
you'd have to act for you to back up your invention, that really
you did not need to invent in the first place. After all you'd
really only need one of the three real inventions to work (the
two Twin Tower crashes and the Pentagon crash). Surely pulling off
just one of those three would give you enough to say to the
world, we have to make war with Iraq and Islam leaders. Strange
it is, when the USA and Britain did say they had to make war, the
MAIN filling of the pie was "weapons of mass destruction" that
Iraq was supposed to have. The attacks on 9/11 were second-place
to "weapons of mass destruction" when it came down to the nitty-
gritty of declaring war.

Now, besides all the people, you'd have to "buy" or "pay off" in
this Flight 93 conspiracy, you have to dig a huge hole in the
ground, that left very little of the supposed crash of flight 93.
Now you've got to involve some farmer or landlord to go along
(well you're paying him/her big money for a big hole for a plane
that does not exist), but you have to find a landlord to "go
along" with you. Maybe you have to pay off all the neighbors also
for miles around, I mean they might see you coming with your big
hole digging machine. Then I guess you could dig the hole during
the night, to get around that.

But we're not through yet. You have to invent some cell phone
calls, for indeed such are on record as being called from that
plane that does not exist. Now they have to be intermittent call,
not that clear or smooth, for cell phones in 2001 at that high
altitude, did not work too well, but they did work. So you have
to bring in people you "pay off" - into a studio, a secret
studio, or you'd have to buy off more people. You have to get
them to record concerned cell phone calls - again some pro
actors.

We're not through just yet. There is this black box that is
recovered, that tells a good deal of what was going on in the
cock-pit during the last minutes of that flight, that did not
happen, but is an invention of a secret conspiracy. Well you have
to make it look like it was the real thing. So you have to bring
in more super actors (but not from Hollywood or any famous ones,
that would really be dumb if you did, and we know you're not
quite that dumb). So in come the actors to record the terrible
last minutes in the pock-pit of a flight and plane that does not
exist. They have to really put on a super acting show for this
recording, so you offer them even more money than you offer most
of the others in this now HUGE production of United Flight 93,
which never was, but was only in your imagination in a conspiracy
program.

WHY, OH WHY, GO TO ALL THAT TROUBLE OF A CONSPIRACY WITHIN A
CONSPIRACY. THE CRAZY CHANCE OF IT FALLING APART AT SOME POINT,
IS RIDICULOUS TO CONTEMPLATE, WHEN ESPECIALLY YOU COULD JUST
LEAVE IT OUT, AND CONCENTRATE ON THE REAL THINGS THAT YOUR
CONSPIRACY WILL EMPLOY. WHY SPIN YOUR WHEELS AND SPEND YOUR MONEY
INVENTING A MADE UP CONSPIRACY WITHIN YOUR CONSPIRACY. IT IS
LUNATIC MADNESS TO CREATE MORE INVENTED CONSPIRACY WITHIN A
CONSPIRACY THAT WILL HAVE REAL PLANES AND REAL PEOPLE TAKING THEM
OVER TO DO REAL CRASHES.

If that isn't enough then we can add this. A movie was made on
Flight 93. I have it. On the back cover it says: "United 93: The
Families and the Film - Discover the real-life stories behind the
brave passengers and crew aboard United Flight 93 through the
interviews with their families."

If the conspiracy buffs are right, then all these real-life
interviews for this movie, are all play actors, hired by the USA
Government to say the things they say. If the story is all a
conspiracy, if the plane never was, if it was all made up, then
again these family interviews are people who were in on the
conspiracy, paid off, brought in by the Government to do what
they did, and as before said, this would have to go into people
who know these people, and so on down the line, for, for everyone
who claimed he/she was a sister or friend of this specific
individual killed on flight 93, there are other people, many
other people, who KNOW THAT person, who says they are family or
friends of such and such a person on that flight.

IT IS ALL BEYOND SENSIBLE LOGIC - IT IS ALL NUTTY AS A NUT FRUIT-
CAKE!!

Then we have some claiming Flight 93 was SHOT DOWN!

So these people at least agree there was a United Flight 93 on
September 11th 2001. But to them the conspiracy involves shooting
down the plane. The conspiracy folk may have all kinds of ideas as
to why the plane had to be shot down. Maybe the Government knew
it was not going as plan A, so they had to bring in plan B -
shoot it from the sky.

In so doing there would have been wreckage scattered for miles
over the ground below. It would have been impossible to have
picked up all the plane pieces and body pieces flung far and
wide, before many people on the ground would have found some, and
all that truth would have come out as clear as the sun on a
cloudless day. If plan B was to shoot it from the sky, how would
you know WHEN to blow it apart, over what area and what State?
How could you possibly pay off the people below so they would
never tell anyone they found an arm or a leg or a seat or some
luggage in their back yard or corn field?

No matter how logically sane I have made this, I know the die-in-
the-wool conspiracy geeks will NOT see it, they will pass over it
like I never wrote it, they will throw logic out of the window
into the big deep blue sea. They are drugged on "conspiracy"
ideas like there is no tomorrow; somehow "conspiracy" gives them
a "high" - yes some get a thrill up-and-down their spine from
"conspiracy."

BE THAT AS IT MAY. YOU CAN KNOW THE TRUTH AND AS JESUS SAID, THE
TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE.

THERE ARE MANY SINS AND WRONGS THAT HAVE BEEN DONE AND ARE BEING
DONE BY AMERICA AND THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH PEOPLES, BUT A
CONSPIRACY OF KILLING THEIR PEOPLE AND MANY OTHERS FROM DIFFERENT
NATIONS ON SEPTEMBER 11TH 2001, WAS NOT ONE OF THEM.

Ain't through yet, there is more to come!

Keith Hunt

                     ................................


  Home Previous Page Top of Page Next Page

 
Navigation List:
 

 
Word Search:

PicoSearch
  Help